Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James Marsalek vs Dekel Bar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marsalek vs Bar analysis and find out who is favored!
James Marsalek vs Dekel Bar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marsalek 2 - 0 Bar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marsalek has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marsalek, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marsalek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marsalek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marsalek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 117/ 103), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 27/ 38). Bar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 126/ 159), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marsalek winning 2 times and Bar being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Marsalek winning 4 and Bar winning 1. The last match between Marsalek and Bar was at the Israel F9, 06-05-2013, First, Hard with James Marsalek getting the victory 6-1 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marsalek and Bar have played a deciding set 1 times, with Marsalek winning 1 times and Bar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marsalek winning 0, and Bar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marsalek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marsalek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marsalek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
537
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
593
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
50% (198-201)
Career Total W/L
43% (126-166)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,575
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For James Marsalek vs Dekel Bar For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Marsalek VS Bar
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | James Marsalek | Dekel Bar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James Marsalek | Dekel Bar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
James Marsalek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alec Adamson
Player
James Marsalek
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
James Marsalek
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernardo Saraiva
Player
James Marsalek
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
James Marsalek
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
James Marsalek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Alon Elia
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Daniel Entelis
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Guez
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dekel Bar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ram Kapach
Player
Dekel Bar
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Edan Bakshi
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Dekel Bar
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
50%
(
2 of
4)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
33%
(
1 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
2
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Dekel Bar
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Shane Monroe
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Kushaan Nath
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Dekel Bar
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Edward Nguyen
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
43%
(
41 of
96)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ronnie Schneider
Player
Dekel Bar
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
Player
Dekel Bar
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marsalek Vs Bar Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Marsalek are available here and Bar photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
